Dermatology

Latest News

Dupilumab Cardiometabolic Safety in Real-World Study Supports Clinical Trial Evidence / image credit University of Lubeck, Germany
Dupilumab Cardiometabolic Safety in Real-World Study of Atopic Dermatitis Supports Clinical Trial Evidence

February 21st 2025

Treatment of AD with dupilumab, compared with cyclosporine and methotrexate, was associated with significantly reduced risk of a wide range of CV outcomes at 1 year.

FDA Clears IND for Alphyn’s Zabalafin Hydrogel for Atopic Dermatitis
FDA Clears IND for Alphyn’s Zabalafin Hydrogel for Atopic Dermatitis

February 20th 2025

FDA Grants Fast Track Designation to Rezpegaldesleukin for Atopic Dermatitis / Image credit: ©InfiniteStudio/AdobeStock
FDA Grants Fast Track Designation to Rezpegaldesleukin for Atopic Dermatitis

February 10th 2025

 Atopic Dermatitis First, Now Onto Asthma for Enveda's Oral Small Molecule Anti-inflammatory Candidate
Atopic Dermatitis First, Now Onto Asthma for Enveda's Oral Small Molecule Anti-inflammatory Candidate

February 7th 2025

Dupilumab Drug Survival Rates Superior to Those for Upadacitinib and Tralokinumab in Atopic Dermatitis: Large-Scale, Real-World Data
Dupilumab Drug Survival Rates Superior to Those for Upadacitinib and Tralokinumab in Atopic Dermatitis: Large-Scale, Real-World Data

February 7th 2025

Latest CME Events & Activities

Expert Illustrations & Commentaries™: Picturing the Potential Role of OX40 and OX40L Inhibitors in Atopic Dermatitis

View More

Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS): Deepening Foundations of Knowledge in Disease Pathogenesis, Disease Severity Assessment, and Treatment Decision-Making

View More

Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Therapy Advances Into Melanoma

View More

Community Practice Connections™: 20th Annual International Symposium on Melanoma and Other Cutaneous Malignancies

View More

Clinical Consultations™: Optimizing Treatment Outcomes for Patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis

View More

Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis (RAD) Conference 2025

June 6-7, 2025

Register Now!

Advances in™ Atopic Dermatitis: Addressing Unmet Needs in Patients With Skin of Color

View More

Clinical Consultations™: Guiding Patients with Genital Psoriasis Toward Relief Through a Multidisciplinary Approach

View More

Patient, Provider & Caregiver Connection™: Understanding the Patient Journey to Provide Personalized Care for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis

View More

Cases and Conversations™: Applying Practice Techniques to Optimize Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis

View More

Cases and Conversations™: Applying Best Practices to Prevent Shingles in Your Practice

View More

‘REEL’ Time Patient Counseling™: Fostering Effective Conversations in Practice to Create a Visible Impact for Patients Living with Genital Psoriasis

View More

Dermalorian™ Webinar: Shedding Light on Patient-Reported Outcomes to Assess Disease Severity in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis

View More

Where Do Biologics Fit Into the Management of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis?

View More

More News


Site Logo

Close Reading Sheds New Light on a Puzzling Rash

December 31st 2006

In Dr Sean Eric Koon's Case In Point, "Puzzling Rash in an Older Woman"(CONSULTANT, April 15, 2003, page 629), I agree with his conclusion that thispatient had cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis (CLV) (Figure). I also agreethat she met the American College of Rheumatology's 1990 criteria for a diagnosisof hypersensitivity vasculitis.1 However, given the patient's history and laboratoryresults, I believe further evaluation was warranted to determine whether the medication was indeed to blame for her CLV or whether an underlying systemicdisease was responsible.Her white blood cell (WBC) count was 72,000/?L. CLV is known to producea mild leukocytosis--presumably caused by the inflammatory response of the vasculitis.Thus, one would expect to see only a slight elevation in the WBC count.Also, if the elevation had been produced by the inflammatory response of the CLV,the patient's erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) would have been significantlyelevated. However, her ESR was 12 mm/h, which is essentially normal in awoman this age.The discovery of a value that is not consistent with the disease process makesme question Dr Koon's final diagnosis--or at least want to add to his differentiala disease that could be responsible for both the CLV and the level of leukocytosisseen here: hairy cell leukemia.Other facts in the case that tend not to support the conclusion that the patient'sCLV resulted from a drug reaction include the following:One would expect to see systemic symptoms, such as fever, malaise, anorexia,and/or myalgias if a drug reaction caused the CLV; this woman reportedly didnot experience any of these.Rashes associated with CLV produced by a drug reaction are generally describedby patients as pruritic, painful (sometimes significantly so), and/or associatedwith paresthesias, such as a burning or stinging sensation; this patient's rash isdescribed as "painless and nonpruritic."Thus, although an exogenous agent such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole(TMP-SMX) can cause CLV, it would have been prudent in view of the findingsin this case to search for an endogenous cause, such as an underlying systemicdisease or malignancy.----Pamela Moyers Scott, MPAS, PA-CWilliamsburg, WVaThank you for your comments. You detected a typo; this patient's leukocytecount was actually 7200/?L. A value of 72,000/?L would indeedbe of concern and would prompt a new differential diagnosis. HerWBC count when last checked was 7300/?L.Ultimately, my determination was that the patient's rash was mostlikely triggered by a viral infection and not by the TMP-SMX. I felt that anotherhealth care provider had inappropriately treated her upper respiratory tractinfection with an antibiotic, so I stopped the medication. Because I could notcompletely rule out the antibiotic as a cause of this potentially serious condition,I recommended that she avoid it in the future. This is yet another exampleof how the treatment of colds with antibiotics can confuse the clinical pictureand possibly harm the patient.--Sean Eric Koon, MD  &nbspFontana, Calif


Site Logo

Role of Anti–SS-A and Anti–SS-B Tests in Sjögren Diagnosis

December 31st 2006

I enjoyed the article by Kenneth H. Fye, MD, "Rheumatic Disease: How to Use theLab in the Workup" (CONSULTANT, March 2004, page 369). However, I foundthe following statement to be misleading: "Anti-SS-A and anti-SS-B determinationsare necessary to rule out Sjgren syndrome in patients with sicca complaints."If the results of these tests are negative, but Sjgren syndrome was initiallysuspected based on the history, labial biopsy is required. Many persons with thisdisease have negative antibody test results.Unfortunately, it often takes years before Sjgren syndrome is correctly diagnosedin most patients. This is usually because a health care provider rules it outbased on negative results of anti-SS-A and anti-SS-B tests.---- Paula Hochberg, ARNPSarasota, FlaYou are correct that negative results of tests foranti-SS-A and anti-SS-B antibodies do not ruleout Sjgren syndrome. Although the majorityof patients with this syndrome have these antibodies,a significant minority do not. If, in thislatter group of patients, Sjgren syndrome is strongly suspectedon clinical grounds, a minor salivary gland biopsyshould be considered. Biopsy is the most specific andsensitive test for Sjgren syndrome. Although a biopsy isnot required to make the diagnosis in every patient, thereare clearly those with negative tests for anti-SS-A andanti-SS-B in whom a biopsy is necessary to confirm suspectedSjgren syndrome. Thus, my statement shouldhave read instead, "Positive anti-SS-A and anti-SS-B determinationssupport a diagnosis of Sjgren syndrome inpatients with sicca complaints."---- Kenneth H. Fye, MDClinical Professor of MedicineRheumatology DivisionUniversity of California, San Francisco,School of Medicine

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.